« Energy & Geopolitics | Main | I Will Derive - Gloria Gaynor »

May 24, 2008

On The Next War

Thomas P.M. Barnett argues that Bob Gates has begun to shift the Department of Defense's thinking on force structure and the likely form of America's enemies in the coming century. In particular, Gates poo-poos "next-war-itis", the idea that the armed forces should be organised and equipped for the next war with a great power (take your pick: China, Russia &c) saying "it is hard to conceive of any country confronting the United States directly in conventional terms".

Instead he notes that the U.S. is more likely to be challenged by enemies engaged in guerrilla warfare a la Iraq and Afghanistan:

Smaller, irregular forces – insurgents, guerrillas, terrorists – will find ways, as they always have, to frustrate and neutralize the advantages of larger, regular militaries. And even nation-states will try to exploit our perceived vulnerabilities in an asymmetric way, rather than play to our inherent strengths.

It is this threat that the U.S. needs to prepare itself, challenging that "major weapons program, in order to remain viable, will have to show some utility and relevance to the kind of irregular campaigns". He wants the forces to demonstrate how they can institutionalise guerrilla warfare drawing on the painful learning gained in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The counter-insurgency doctrine that General Petraeus co-developed has been and overwhelming success in Iraq. This isn't being achieved by fielding big ticket weapons systems: the F-22 or the Seawolf are impotent. In his masterpiece, The Shield of Achilles, Philip Bobbitt argues that:

The mobilization of the industrial capacity of a nation is irrelevant to such threats; the fielding of vast tank armies and fleets of airplanes is as clumsy as a bear trying to fend off bees.

Success is being achieved by U.S. forces protecting Iraqi civilians from the Islamist guerrilla fighters AND getting involved in helping Iraqis rebuild sewage plants, schools, police stations. This is precisely the dual function of Leviathan and SysAdmin that TPM has been promoting over the last few years.

It will be hard for the defense establishment to resist the move away from big nation-state war to the smaller guerrilla market-state war given the exemplary successes U.S. forces have had in Iraq in wielding both the stick (Leviathan) and carrot (SysAdmin).

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4bb153ef00e55279d4108833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On The Next War:

» Tom around the web from Thomas P.M. Barnett :: Weblog
Links to What will America do when Iran gets nuclear weapons? + Quality Leadership Weblog + Information Dissemination + Global Students Connect + North Korea Blog + SWJ Blog + Politics of Scrabble linked Hillary Clinton, the least potential downside.... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

uh oh... I can see a whopping big black swan in the making here..

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

January 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31